Oh, sure, Colonel Stepney said sarcastically. He just went out at that particular place on the road to dig up some gladioli bulbs, and when he dug down to where he thought the bulbs would be, imagine his surprise to find a lot of oiled silk packets. He put them in his pocket because he didnt know what else to do with them and then decided what was the use of trying to get the gladioli bulbs. He... § 3. There remains a third improper use of the term Induction, which it is of real importance to clear up, because the theory of Induction has been, in no ordinary degree, confused by it, and because the confusion is exemplified in the most recent and elaborate treatise on the inductive philosophywhich exists in our language. The error in question is that of confounding a mere description, by general terms, of a set of observed phenomena, with an induction from them. How about the chef who prepared this unforgettable dinner? I said. The erroneous method of which we are now to treat is, on the contrary, peculiar to thinking and studious minds. It never could have suggested itself but to persons of some familiarity with the nature of scientific research; who, being aware of the impossibility of establishing, by casual observation or direct experimentation, a true theory of sequences so complex as are those of the social phenomena, have recourse to the simpler laws which are immediately operative in those phenomena, and which are no other than the laws of the nature of the human beings therein concerned, These thinkers perceive (what the partisans of the chemical or experimental theory do not) that the science of society must necessarily be deductive. But, from an insufficient consideration of the specific nature of the subject-matter—and often because (their own scientific education having stopped short in too early a stage) geometry stands in their minds as the type of all deductive science—it is to geometry, rather than to astronomy and natural philosophy, that they unconsciously assimilate the deductive science of society. The doctors think you should be OK to leave later today, Cleo said. ‘Depending how you’re feeling. They want to do another brain scan, just to be sure.’ What caused it? The instances requisite for the prosecution of a directly experimental inquiry into the formation of character, would be a number of human beingsto bring up and educate, from infancy to mature age. And to perform any one of these experiments with scientific propriety, it would be necessary to know and record every sensation or impression received by the young pupil from a period long before it could speak; including its own notions respecting the sources of all those sensations and impressions. It is not only impossible to do this completely, but even to do so much of it as should constitute a tolerable approximation. One apparently trivial circumstance which eluded our vigilance might let in a train of impressions and associations sufficient to vitiate the experiment as an authentic exhibition of the effects flowing from given causes. No one who has sufficiently reflected on education is ignorant of this truth; and whoever has not, will find it most instructively illustrated in the writings of Rousseau and Helvetius on that great subject. The latter supposition might have been an admissible one in a very early period of our study of nature. But we have been able to perceive that in the stage which mankind have now reached, the generalization which gives the Law of Universal Causation has grown into a stronger and better induction, one deserving of greater reliance, than any of the subordinate generalizations. We may even, I think, go a step further than this, and regard the certainty of that great induction as not merely comparative, but, for all practical purposes, complete. I grant that thedecision of questions of Existence usually if not always depends on a previous question of either Causation or Co-existence. But Existence is nevertheless a different thing from Causation or Co-existence, and can be predicated apart from them. The meaning of the abstract name Existence, and the connotation of the concrete name Being, consist, like the meaning of all other names, in sensations or states of consciousness: their peculiarity is that to exist, is to excite, or be capable of exciting, any sensations or states of consciousness: no matter what, but it is indispensable that there should be some. It was from overlooking this that Hegel, finding that Being is an abstraction reached by thinking away all particular attributes, arrived at the self-contradictory proposition on which he founded all his philosophy, that Being is the same as Nothing. It is really the name of Something, taken in the most comprehensive sense of the word. Well, dont let Lieutenant Tyler know about it. Put it in as a routine license check. Shucks, the guy had probably been driving slow and it was night, and... Thats right. toothpaste drum box A guy shot me is all. Sneezing from the dust, he knelt and brought his wrists to his face, rubbing them against his cheek to try to figure out what the bindings were. They felt like cable ties, made from plastic as hard as steel. Giving up, he stumbled to his feet and stood, confused, in the pitch darkness, swaying unsteadily. His watch was meant to be luminous, but he couldnt see the hands. Maybe he’d been in the dark too long. Dont get into trouble with any Indecency Patrols. Oh yes..