70 But the doctrine of causation, when considered as obtaining between our volitions and their antecedents, is almost universally conceived as involving more than this. Many do not believe, and very few practically feel, that there is nothing in causation but invariable, certain, and unconditional sequence. There are few to whom mere constancy of succession appears a sufficiently stringent bond of union for so peculiar a relation as that of cause and effect. Even if the reason repudiates, the imagination retains, the feeling of some more intimate connection, of some peculiar tie, or mysterious constraint exercised by the antecedent over the consequent. Now this it is which, considered as applying to the human will, conflicts with our consciousness, and revolts our feelings. We are certain that, in the case of our volitions, there is not this mysterious constraint. We know that we are not compelled, as by a magical spell, to obey any particular motive. We feel, that if we wished to prove that we have the power of resisting the motive, we could do so (that wish being, it needs scarcely be observed, anew antecedent); and it would be humiliating to our pride, and (what is of more importance) paralyzing to our desire of excellence, if we thought otherwise. But neither is any such mysterious compulsion now supposed, by the best philosophical authorities, to be exercised by any other cause over its effect. Those who think that causes draw their effects after them by a mystical tie, are right in believing that the relation between volitions and their antecedents is of another nature. But they should go farther, and admit that this is also true of all other effects and their antecedents. If such a tie is considered to be involved in the word Necessity, the doctrine is not true of human actions; but neither is it then true of inanimate objects. It would be more correct to say that matter is not bound by necessity, than that mind is so. Accordingly, in the cases, unfortunately very numerous and important, in which the causes do not suffer themselves to be separated and observed apart, there is much difficulty in laying down with due certainty the inductive foundation necessary to support the deductive method. This difficulty is most of all conspicuous in the case of physiological phenomena; it being seldom possible to separate the different agencies which collectively compose an organized body, without destroying the very phenomena which it is our object to investigate: It was Frank Essex who answered the question, gazing at Marion with that look of amused superiority with which husbands sometimes regard their wives.What does age have to do with it? Quite a few people are trying to see her. Doesnt it get in the way when you lick your friend’s pussy? Phil. of Disc., p. 338. Did you hear any smacking sound that would indicate the bullet had struck water? Annie hit me with a hammer, she says. It would, however, be a mistake to expect that those great generalizations, from which the subordinate truths of the more backward sciences will probably at some future period be deduced by reasoning (as the truths of astronomy are deduced from the generalities of the Newtonian theory), will be found in all, or even in most cases, among truths now known and admitted. We may rest assured, that many of the most general laws of nature are as yet entirely unthought of; and that many others, destined hereafter to assume the same character, are known, if at all, only as laws or properties of some limited class of phenomena; just as electricity, now recognized as one of the most universal of natural agencies, was once known only as a curious property which certain substances acquired by friction, of first attracting and then repelling light bodies. If the theories of heat, cohesion, crystallization, and chemical action are destined, as there can be little doubt that they are, to become deductive, the truths which will then be regarded as theprincipia of those sciences would probably, if now announced, appear quite as novel[158] as the law of gravitation appeared to the contemporaries of Newton; possibly even more so, since Newtons law, after all, was but an extension of the law of weight—that is, of a generalization familiar from of old, and which already comprehended a not inconsiderable body of natural phenomena.The general laws of a similarly commanding character, which we still look forward to the discovery of, may not always find so much of their foundations already laid. Hows Europe anyway? I gave her five dollars and she looked at it and said:Anything you want, mister, is yours. Is there anybody you dont want to see? 41 Crandalls his lawyer, same as he’s the lawyer for most of the money men in town. Crandall’s good I guess; I don’t know him. Trenton noticed only that Linda Carroll, her eyes wide, was standing close to the rail, looking down at them, and that beside her Merton Ostrander stood, completely fascinated. Lindas hands were moving rapidly in enthusiastic applause. Merton Ostrander clapped a half dozen times, then put his hands on the rail. His face held a puzzled frown. Quite evidently he was in deep thought. Maybe we could have helped her. How about the keys? Joe asked. Didnt you lock her up?.